The USEA has launched a new system for tabulating points for the year-end leaderboards which will begin with the 2021 competition season. Previously, leaderboard points were awarded based on placing and further determined by the number of starters in a division, often giving the focus to the quantity of rides a competitor could complete in a given competition season. The new system places emphasis on quality by limiting the types of scores that qualify for leaderboard points and counting only a rider’s six top results towards the leaderboards.
“The system has been under review for a while,” shared Sharon Gallagher, USEA Senior Director of Competitions. “Packy McGaughan was a big promoter of changing the system from quantity – the more results you had the better chance you had – to the quality of the ride. It is a more complex use of the point system to determine a final standing. Yet, utilizing a point system is really the only practical way to make determinations based on performance and coming up with a solution wasn’t easy. The FEI had already put a similar system into place for their world rankings and regional rankings, and that’s where the foundation for this system came from.”
“It’s been a central point of conversation for a while,” reiterated USEA CEO Rob Burk. “For example, it was brought up at the USEA Annual Meeting & Convention in 2017 that when Karen Stives won Rider of the Year in the 1981, she did it with about a dozen rides. These days we’re seeing riders with significantly more rides than that contributing to their overall leaderboard placing.”
The new system was first approved by the USEA Calendar, Competition, & Rules Committee before going before the USEA Board of Governors for final approval to implement for the 2021 competition year, which started on December 1, 2020.
The intention with the new leaderboard calculations, which is described in detail below, is to place the emphasis on the quality of a competitor’s rides, not the quantity of rides they are able to complete.
Shown below is the top 10 from the 2019 USEA Rider of the Year leaderboard:
Rank |
Name |
Points |
1 |
Boyd Martin |
841.5 |
2 |
Phillip Dutton |
654.5 |
3 |
Lauren Nicholson |
591.5 |
4 |
Tamra Smith |
508.25 |
5 |
Elisabeth Halliday-Sharp |
488.0 |
6 |
Bruce Davidson Jr. |
460.0 |
7 |
Leslie Law |
412.0 |
8 |
Doug Payne |
404.5 |
9 |
Will Faudree |
363.0 |
10 |
William Coleman |
361.0 |
Now, here’s what the top 10 from the 2019 USEA Rider of the Year leaderboard would have looked like when calculated using the new system:
Rank |
Name |
Points |
1 |
Boyd Martin |
372 |
2 |
Lauren Nicholson |
325 |
3 |
Phillip Dutton |
294 |
4 |
Doug Payne |
222 |
5 |
Elisabeth Halliday-Sharp |
209 |
6 |
Bruce Davidson Jr. |
204 |
7 |
Tamra Smith |
202 |
8 |
Leslie Law |
200 |
9 |
Lynn Symansky |
194 |
10 |
Felix Vogg |
177 |
While some of the standings shift around, Boyd Martin is still ranked number one on the leaderboard. Overall point values are also significantly lower and more tightly packed because they are based on a maximum of six results.
Changes to the USEA Leaderboard Point System
To understand the leaderboard it is important to understand the terminology. A final score is the number of penalty points with which a pair finishes a competition – a dressage score plus any jumping or time faults obtained in the jumping phases. A final placing is the result based on where a score falls in the division. Leaderboard points are based on the final placing.
Scores -> Placings -> Points
The first significant change to the USEA leaderboard point system is that only Minimum Eligibility Requirements (MERs) will be considered for the year-end leaderboards. MERs can be earned at either USEA recognized competitions in the U.S. or, for competitions outside the U.S., those that are recognized by the FEI.
MERs for Beginner Novice, Novice, Training, Modified, Preliminary, Intermediate, and Advanced require the following:
MERs for the FEI levels (CCI* through CCI5*-L) are consistent with the following:
The second significant change is that leaderboard point values are only applied to the top 25 percent of starters in a division that have achieved an MER. So, for example, in a division of eight horse-and-rider combinations, only first and second places would be eligible to receive leaderboard points based on their placings and ONLY if those scores were MERs. A score that includes 20 penalty points from cross-country or more than four rails in show jumping, even if that final score finishes in the top 25 percent of the division, is not eligible to receive leaderboard points.
These two new changes will determine which placings are eligible to receive leaderboard points. The third change determines which of those points are counted on the year-end leaderboards and determine final leaderboard standings. The points based on the six best scores earned by horse or rider during the current competition year will determine the final leaderboard standings. For example, if a rider achieves eight MERs in a competition year and their final score places them in the top 25 percent of their division, only the points earned from the six best scores will be counted toward the year-end leaderboards. It is important to note that the six scores that qualify for an overall leaderboard may not be the same six scores that qualify for a divisional leaderboard.
A rider does not need to have six eligible scores to appear on the leaderboard. A horse or rider could achieve points from a single placing at a single event and still be placed higher on the leaderboard than a horse or rider who achieved fewer points from multiple placings at multiple events, as some types of events (like FEI and USEA Classic Series Events) are more heavily weighted in the USEA leaderboard point system than regular horse trials.
In the event that there is a tie for leaderboard champion, the champion will be determined by taking the average of their top six scores. The horse or rider with the lowest average will be named champion. If there is still equality, the tie remains.
An Example
Sally Jones and her horse Buckaroo are competing in a Junior Novice division. There are 20 total horse-and-rider combinations in her division. At the end of the weekend, only the top five placings will be eligible to receive points base on their final placings.
Sally and Buckaroo have a great weekend. They score a 27.5 in dressage, jump double clear on cross-country, and have one rail down in show jumping to finish the weekend on a final score of 31.5. This score is good enough for second place. Because Sally and Buckaroo obtained an MER and their score relative to their competitors placed them in the top 25 percent of their division, they will receive 2.5 points towards the overall year-end leaderboards and 6 points towards the Novice year-end leaderboards for which they qualify.
Sally’s friend Jane Smith and her horse Quicksilver didn’t have quite as good of a weekend. They scored an 18 in dressage and jumped clear in show jumping but had one refusal on cross-country to finish on a final score of 38. Jane and Quicksilver finished in fifth place, also within the top 25 percent of their division, but because their score is not an MER, they will not receive any leaderboard points based on their final placing.
This was Sally and Buckaroo’s sixth and final event of the competition season. Her score of 31.5 is one of her six best scores for the whole season. So, the leaderboard points she earned for finishing in second place on a score of 31.5 are added together with the points she earned from her other eligible completions to create her final leaderboard score.
Key Takeaways
The 2021 overall and division leaderboards will go live on the USEA website soon. To view the new USEA leaderboard point system, including charts detailing placings and their point values, click here.
Did you know that the USEA Foundation awards over 150 grants each year to deserving individuals who are involved in the sport of eventing? With grants that assist riders with accomplishing their competition goals, grants geared toward licensed officials, grants that are specific to continuing education for coaches, grants that assist competitions with obtaining frangible technology, and so much more, there really is a grant opportunity available to almost anyone!
With the start of the New Year just days away, now is the time to consider how your actions can have a positive impact on the sport of eventing in 2025. Each and every member of the eventing community has an important role to play in ensuring the sport continues to grow and thrive. From fostering educational opportunities to supporting grassroots initiatives and participating at all levels of the sport, there are so many ways to get involved.
Ride iQ’s popular “Ask An Expert” series features professional advice and tips from all areas of the horse industry. One of the most-downloaded episodes is an expert session with Peter Gray, an accomplished dressage judge and Olympic eventer. He has recently judged at events like the five-star at the Defender Kentucky Three-Day Event, and he served on the ground jury at the 2022 FEI World Eventing Championships in Pratoni, Italy. His background as a competitor in the Olympic Games riding for Bermuda and as a coach and selector for the Canadian eventing team adds depth to his understanding of the sport.
With a total of 382 volunteer hours in 2024, Catherine “Cathy” Hale not only topped the USEA Area III VIP Volunteer leaderboard, but she also ranked fourth out of all eventing volunteers across the country. Hale (The Villages, Florida) has worked as a travel agent for over 30 years, a career that suits her love of travel nicely. At the time of being interviewed for this article, Hale was passing the equator on a cruise to Tahiti, New Zealand, and Australia.